In a conventional software development project, testing happens before the software is released into production. If defects or usability concerns are discovered, the launch will be postponed until those issues are resolved.
In this approach, testing became a significant bottleneck, making it difficult for projects to be completed by the set deadlines. Because development and quality assurance (QA) were different entities, projects could not adapt to shifting requirements and expectations, resulting in unfavorable business results.
One way to avoid this is by implementing shift left testing. If you want to improve your software development process, keep reading! In this blog, you'll learn about the fundamentals of shift left testing: shift left’s meaning, what a shift left strategy is, and how to use it in your own company.
Shift Left is a movement that advocates changing the way we handle software quality improvement. In the past, we relied on a waterfall approach in which developers and quality assurance specialists had separate roles and responsibilities.
Shifting left refers to bringing the testing stage of the software development life cycle (SDLC) earlier into the process. By doing so, teams become more collaborative and share information as quickly and frequently as possible.
Shift left software testing and QA refers to the earlier integration of testing operations with information gathering, design, and development requirements. The shift left takes care of issues when they arise and ensures fewer flaws later in the SDLC.
When testing is scheduled at the end of the development process, any issues that do appear are usually more challenging to resolve. Because all the code has been written, the only way to fix the problem is to overhaul the software and rewrite the code completely. As a result, costs rise, and the time to market lengthens significantly.
The sooner bugs are fixed, the better. Shift-left testing involves a process that allows quality assurance engineers to find bugs quickly and frequently. The easiest bugs to correct are those found when developers write or review code since these code blocks are small and easy to manage.
After being combined with the primary development branch, the scope of the code increases, as does the amount of time it takes to hunt for errors. In this approach, quality assurance engineers will act more like specialists, providing their expertise and guidance from the start of the SDLC to completion.
By implementing the left-shift testing approach, organizations can prioritize quality from the outset of a project and work to uncover flaws as early as possible in the life cycle. The following are some of the significant advantages of shifting left.
It is essential for delivering high-quality software quickly. To reduce rework and disruptions, developers move testing to the beginning of the process, or more correctly, to the left, to minimize extended test cycles, avoid flaws, and manage risks early in the SDLC rather than later.
If each build is tested, issues become easier to identify and may be fixed at lower costs. Doing quality assurance as we move along the process also means avoiding high costs and extra work of going back and redoing everything.
Shifting left helps you gain an edge over your competition, reducing the time to market. Using incremental innovation, engineering teams can move quickly, establish credibility, and maintain it. Shifting left addresses the challenge of faster progress while maintaining quality.
Shifting left allows you to automate testing more effectively. In addition to minimizing human error, test automation increases coverage, reduces production issues, and frees up testers' time to work on more exciting and satisfying projects.
Here are some of the things you can do to shift your software testing to the left:
A shift left testing strategy may not always deliver optimal results or improve functionality in a real-life setting. In such cases, a shift-right testing approach can improve the customer experience by allowing test automation and ensuring improved test coverage.
With the shift-right approach, you will test a fully developed and functional application to check its performance and usability characteristics. Reviews and input from specific users also help improve the software's quality.
Balance both strategies based on software maturity and testing goals.
It can be implemented in your company by following these steps.
Establishing code standards for your development team is an excellent place to start. All developers must have the same understanding of the project. This allows them to check code more quickly and ensures greater quality. Since these coding standards prevent incorrect or unsafe code, they should reduce the frequency of errors.
Figure out which tools can help your codebase as a group. The group should also consider how testing will be included in the SDLC early on. One strategy is adopting the agile method, which works with tiny code increments known as sprints.
However, many organizations need help transitioning to an agile approach. As a result, the project team may agree to build unit tests for every new feature, which gives them confidence when developing business logic.
Integration tests should be written for these different bits of code at a later stage to ensure that they work together seamlessly.
Since it requires regular testing, the project team should adopt test automation tools. In addition to releasing new builds, tests for every code increment should also be automated. This will relieve the load on QA responsibilities and bring faster feedback on the code's reliability.
Here are a few things to expect if your company uses shift left testing.
According to many agile methods, involving the customer in the software development is critical to its success. Shifting left while involving customers in your testing process is advantageous for you.
In traditional systems, testers must wait until developers have established software features before testing. By shifting left, testing is prioritized earlier in the development process and more frequently. As a result, there will be less time spent waiting for testers.
Teams and organizations can use the test automation pyramid to decide which automated software tests to undertake. According to the pyramid, unit tests are advised since they are easy to execute, cost less to set up, and require less developer effort.
If your company uses shift left testing, developers will almost certainly create unit tests before or after generating production code. As a result, you will also be following the recommendations of the testing pyramid.
It has the added benefit of increasing test coverage. If more people create tests more regularly and start earlier, a larger percentage of your software will be evaluated by tests.
It's becoming more normal for everyone in a software company to do testing. This is not only beneficial but also necessary for genuine shift left testing. Making testing a comprehensive, ongoing activity is only possible with enlisting all available resources. Fortunately, tools available today allow even non-programmers to create extensive tests in previously unimaginable ways.
One of the most challenging aspects of test automation is tedious test maintenance. When your test suite is full of flimsy tests, even the tiniest modification to the codebase can cause a test to fail. As a result, managing the tests becomes a big chore, jeopardizing the entire test automation effort. When you use shift left testing, you must pay special attention to test maintenance issues since you will have more tests of various kinds.
Here are some of the latest AI trends that are shaping the shift left automation:
AI tools are increasingly used to automatically generate test cases by analyzing requirements, code patterns, or past testing data. This approach prepares test cases much earlier in development, ensuring comprehensive coverage and reducing manual intervention.
AI-powered predictive analytics is helping teams identify areas of the code that are more likely to contain defects. By analyzing historical data and code patterns, AI can pinpoint high-risk areas, allowing developers to focus their testing efforts where they matter most.
In continuous testing, AI is utilized to prioritize and optimize the execution of tests based on risk and importance. As developers write and commit code, AI systems can automatically run the most critical tests, providing faster feedback.
AI-driven self-healing capabilities enable automated test scripts to automatically adapt to application UI, API, or functionality changes. This reduces the need for manual updates to test cases whenever small changes are made, ensuring the automation remains effective without constant intervention.
With the help of AI and Natural Language Processing (NLP), testers and developers can now write test cases in plain, human-readable language. AI then converts these descriptions into automated test scripts. This trend is making test automation more accessible, even for team members who do not have strong coding skills, and accelerates the creation of test cases.
AI is used to generate and manage realistic test data early in development. AI-driven tools can create dynamic data sets that reflect real-world usage, ensuring that tests are more representative of production environments. This reduces errors related to insufficient or incorrect test data.
Consider a complex SaaS-based CRM application with various modules, from contact management to sales forecasting. Ensuring comprehensive test coverage in this complex ecosystem is extremely time-intensive. Creating test cases to anticipate user scenarios and potential edge cases is also inherently prone to human error.
The advent of Generative AI has streamlined the shift left process, offering speed, efficiency, and scale throughout numerous use cases.
Leveraging transformer-based architectures, AI models can autonomously generate test cases by analyzing functional specifications from CRM systems. Traditionally, a manual tester would reference specified requirements to script scenarios, but generative AI can interpret these specifications to create test cases automatically, significantly saving time and effort.
For example, a human tester might evaluate the "create new contact" feature by testing typical scenarios with valid or invalid data. AI, however, can extend testing beyond these basic checks:
These AI-driven tests accelerate development cycles and enhance the product's reliability, ultimately contributing to higher software quality.
In the CRM’s complex web of data, the potential for lurking bugs or inefficiencies poses a significant threat to the application's performance and user experience. The predictive prowess of generative AI transcends conventional bug detection methodologies, enabling the CRM's development team to proactively identify and address potential pitfalls before they culminate into significant issues.
Consider a scenario where the visualization module relies on multiple nested loops navigating through extensive data arrays. While human testers might neglect these loops, the AI, through its intricate analysis, can predict potential performance bottlenecks that could hamper the application's efficiency.
Plus, the AI can autonomously generate and execute test scenarios to validate these predictions further. One such scenario might involve simulating a substantial load on the system, mimicking thousands of concurrent users accessing the visualization feature simultaneously. This stress test validates the AI's predictions and reveals how the suspected bottlenecks might impact the application's responsiveness. The technology unveils whether the bottlenecks result in noticeable lags—or, worse, system crashes—under heavy usage.
The fusion of generative AI with Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines introduces a dynamic mechanism for real-time feedback during the software development process.
Imagine integrating the CRM with a marketing automation tool. AI works seamlessly within the CI/CD workflow and swiftly adapts to changes, generating pertinent test scenarios based on the freshly committed code.
If a developer introduces a code segment that fails to validate an external API's payload before processing, the AI instantly springs into action. It crafts a specific test scenario, simulating malicious payloads to probe the system's security. This instantaneous feedback loop acts as an early warning system, swiftly flagging potential vulnerabilities long before the code progresses to later stages of development.
Integrating AI into development infrastructure demands powerful computational resources to support advanced models effectively. High-performance GPUs or TPUs are essential for ensuring smooth and efficient operation.
Moreover, existing testing frameworks and CI/CD pipelines may need middleware integrations or API hooks to enable seamless interaction with and utilization of these AI models.
AI-powered shift left testing offers a range of benefits that enhance the software development process, improve product quality, and streamline the project life cycle. These benefits are often driven by the emphasis on early testing, collaboration, automation, and a proactive approach to quality assurance.
The impact of generative AI within shift left testing is profound. Through automated test case generation, predictive bug discovery, and real-time feedback loops within CI/CD pipelines, this technology expedites development cycles. It significantly elevates the overall quality and reliability of software products. Its ability to simulate diverse scenarios, assess security vulnerabilities, and predict performance bottlenecks redefines the proactive approach to quality assurance.
As we embrace AI's transformative potential in the context of shift-left testing, it's vital to recognize the delicate balance between its advanced capabilities and the need for vigilant oversight.
Biases or limitations within the training data could impair the integrity of the testing outcomes. Embracing generative AI not only fosters innovation but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement and adaptability.
In summary, the synergy of shift-left testing and generative AI offers a powerful avenue for achieving heightened efficiency and software quality. Every team member's shared responsibility in the shift left approach is pivotal.
QASource is poised to support organizations with a comprehensive range of quality assurance testing services, covering automation, automation testing services, manual testing, mobile QA, API testing, and more.
Generative AI's impact is profound. It automates test case generation, predicts bugs, and enhances CI/CD pipelines. Yet careful oversight is crucial to mitigate biases and ensure testing integrity. Embracing generative AI fuels innovation and fosters a culture of continuous improvement, driving excellence in software development.
To learn more about how we can help solve your testing challenges, contact us today!!