QASource Blog

Businesses rely on mobile apps more than ever. In this edition of the expert series, we will discuss the common mobile application vulnerabilities along with their resolutions.

Product businesses today need to stand up to agility and scale to keep up with the demands of their users. This calls for unmatched quality assurance, reduced time-to-market, and reliability - something the traditional QA process may not deliver. Eventually, creating a Testing Center of Excellence (TCoE) represents your commitment to quality.

In today's digital age, eLearning platforms have become an integral part of education, which offers flexible and accessible learning opportunities to students of all ages. Ensuring their quality is important with the increasing demand for eLearning applications. Quality assurance guarantees that eLearning platforms deliver a seamless and enriching learning experience. Strategies for effective QA on eLearning platforms involve a comprehensive approach encompassing various aspects, including functionality, usability, accessibility, and security.

It’s imperative that startups move quickly when releasing new products and features to get them into customers’ hands. Most startups allocate a significant amount of funding and resources for development to accomplish this; likewise, many startups don’t set aside enough for QA. However, there usually comes a tipping point when it becomes necessary to invest in QA. Let’s examine the following scenarios that might motivate you to invest in QA.

Supplying financial services software is about providing customers with peace of mind. Financial services software is specialized software designed to assist financial institutions, such as banks, insurance companies, investment firms, trading, and other financial service providers, manage their operations effectively. In an online world of rapid change and perceived danger, your product can automate various financial processes, improve efficiency, reduce errors, and enhance overall customer experience.

In a conventional software development project, testing happened right before the software was released into production. This meant that if defects or usability concerns were discovered, the launch would be postponed until those issues were resolved. In this approach, testing became a significant bottleneck, making it difficult for projects to be completed by the set deadlines. Because development and quality assurance (QA) were different entities, projects could not adapt to shifting requirements and expectations, resulting in unfavorable business results.